The afternoon of June 21 news, this morning, the broadcasting company sued Shenzhen market supervision by the Court of final appeal judgement in the Guangdong provincial higher people's Court for trial, with the exception of appeals broadcast company which is outside the Shenzhen market supervision report fast play third party company is also involved in the trial. Case will choose a sentencing date. (Click to view trial today live reviews)
Things to June 2014 to begin, at that time, the Administration received the Tencent Shenzhen market reported, on the grounds of copyright infringement of copyright broadcast company, fast play sky-high fines issued up to 260 million Yuan. Subsequently, the broadcasting company said it appealed against the punishment, the Shenzhen market authority to court. Shenzhen City Intermediate Court after the first-instance trial, dismissed the fast play claims. Fast play company appealed against the verdict, which appealed to the Guangdong High Court.
SINA technology broadcast live the trial, appeals and the appeal of the debate focused on the Shenzhen market supervision authority has the right to copyright administrative penalties on fast play; law enforcement forensic compliance legal punishment for fast play heavy, and so on.
On behalf of appellant's counsel submits that the fast play, the case should be a civil tort, and not against the public interest. Listed on the Shenzhen Copyright Bureau and Shenzhen market supervision after making copyright penalties are unfair, accepting the delivery, taking of evidence, the hearing notice, law enforcement Executive qualifications that there are clear violations of several main provisions of national law (Act). Also, fast play felt that the Shenzhen market authority the punishment on the basis of insufficient evidence, sky-high penalties on fast play is not reasonable.
Both sides also broadcast is a search service provided by, the applicability of haven and the principle of technological neutrality for a fierce battle. Fast play party insists it's just search service, there is no direct infringement, even if the infringement was quickly broadcast searches of small sites of third parties. Market authority and Tencent in Shenzhen believe that business model does not have a specific selection of fast play and against who pirated video content for all good popular at the expense of public interests, a bad influence. While Appeal considered fast play pirated and subjective intent tort, and despite repeated and still did not repent and the punishment is reasonable. DKNY iPhone 6 plus
On fast play case involving pirating and infringement, dissemination of pornographic videos at multiple levels. SINA science and technology live in January this year the Beijing Haidian District Court trial broadcast Executive Wang Xin, who spread pornographic videos. According to the information the trial involving Huang involved piracy is the main reason for fast play, the company was sued, founder and CEO of fast play Wang Xin was recommendation and sentenced to 10 years in prison.
Internet copyright protection in recent years by the national attention. Yan Xiaohong, Vice Director of national copyright Council pointed out in April this year, after a special treatment, China's copyright protection environment continued to improve. DKNY
China network copyright protection, China Research Institute of information and communication issued the 2015 annual report, 2015 at all levels of court in civil cases of online music is 687, replacing the previous years cases of online video, as 2015 network types with most infringement cases, the total number of cases of violations of the right to network dissemination of information about 44%. Compare with online music 2015 video infringement case has drastically declined in 2015, courts at all levels heard in network video infringement case to 291, 18% per cent of all Internet copyright infringement case in 2014, representing a reduction of 26%.
Source: SINA
No comments:
Post a Comment